<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UNDERRATED MOVIE: The Iron Giant</title>
	<link>http://www.ayavaron.com/wordpress/index.php/2006/underrated-movie-the-iron-giant/</link>
	<description>Tales from the life of a Geek</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: ayavaron</title>
		<link>http://www.ayavaron.com/wordpress/index.php/2006/underrated-movie-the-iron-giant/#comment-93</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ayavaron.com/wordpress/index.php/2006/underrated-movie-the-iron-giant/#comment-93</guid>
					<description>Yea. I agree with you that the humor wasn't really much. But it makes you laugh, and is natural, fitting in with the plot and character development. It's not funny to be funny (or maybe it is. I guess taht's opinion.) 

Also, I didn't get the message that guns were bad. Gun seemed to me, to be used as a figurative thing and not meant to be taken literally. When Hogarth used it to describe the giant's potential, he meant it as, you don't have to be a violent and evil thing. 

Hogarth enjoyed playing war also. He was pretending to shoot that gun at the Giant in the junkyard at one point. He was just having fun.

I don't think the message was anti-gun, but rather anti-violence, and while that is a weak message, I don't really mind, because not all movies should be taken at more than a face value. View it solely as a story about a boy and a Giant, and it'll be fun. (I'm thinking I should revoke a little of my lofty praise of the movie, but I am hard-pressed to thing of an animated movie I liked better. If I figure one out, I'll let you know.)

As for the end, I was a little bit disapointed with the regeneration. It felt like a copout put there so that little kids wouldn't cry watching the movie. However, the whole self-sacrifice thing, and the confusion caused by Mansley made the climax pretty great.

I liked the characters. Most of the characterization was done in subtle ways that you don't notice until the second or third time you watch it. Tiny mannerisms, background things aren't just there for decoration, but actually contribute to the characters. As for being gneric or horrible, I think that's also a matter of opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea. I agree with you that the humor wasn&#8217;t really much. But it makes you laugh, and is natural, fitting in with the plot and character development. It&#8217;s not funny to be funny (or maybe it is. I guess taht&#8217;s opinion.) </p>
<p>Also, I didn&#8217;t get the message that guns were bad. Gun seemed to me, to be used as a figurative thing and not meant to be taken literally. When Hogarth used it to describe the giant&#8217;s potential, he meant it as, you don&#8217;t have to be a violent and evil thing. </p>
<p>Hogarth enjoyed playing war also. He was pretending to shoot that gun at the Giant in the junkyard at one point. He was just having fun.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the message was anti-gun, but rather anti-violence, and while that is a weak message, I don&#8217;t really mind, because not all movies should be taken at more than a face value. View it solely as a story about a boy and a Giant, and it&#8217;ll be fun. (I&#8217;m thinking I should revoke a little of my lofty praise of the movie, but I am hard-pressed to thing of an animated movie I liked better. If I figure one out, I&#8217;ll let you know.)</p>
<p>As for the end, I was a little bit disapointed with the regeneration. It felt like a copout put there so that little kids wouldn&#8217;t cry watching the movie. However, the whole self-sacrifice thing, and the confusion caused by Mansley made the climax pretty great.</p>
<p>I liked the characters. Most of the characterization was done in subtle ways that you don&#8217;t notice until the second or third time you watch it. Tiny mannerisms, background things aren&#8217;t just there for decoration, but actually contribute to the characters. As for being gneric or horrible, I think that&#8217;s also a matter of opinion.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: vilecharlotte</title>
		<link>http://www.ayavaron.com/wordpress/index.php/2006/underrated-movie-the-iron-giant/#comment-91</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ayavaron.com/wordpress/index.php/2006/underrated-movie-the-iron-giant/#comment-91</guid>
					<description>I disagree with youi on a major level. The Iron Giant in my opinion was movie that had too many messages that were disgustingly pronounced. For example, the message that guns are bad is just a horrible message to exhibit. Guns are necessary in a society were there are unsavory people. Unless we suddenly shift into a Utopian society, guns are necessary as a force. Back to The Iron Giant though. The end was not too my liking. It was predictable and easily created. The characters, generic and to be blunt, horrible. In reference to its humour, this consisted of poopy jokes and stupid situations. For people that want humour and well constructed stories, check out Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas or Weeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with youi on a major level. The Iron Giant in my opinion was movie that had too many messages that were disgustingly pronounced. For example, the message that guns are bad is just a horrible message to exhibit. Guns are necessary in a society were there are unsavory people. Unless we suddenly shift into a Utopian society, guns are necessary as a force. Back to The Iron Giant though. The end was not too my liking. It was predictable and easily created. The characters, generic and to be blunt, horrible. In reference to its humour, this consisted of poopy jokes and stupid situations. For people that want humour and well constructed stories, check out Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas or Weeds.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

